Indiana Court of Appeals rules that Florida v. Fiske does not apply in the case of a man found with dried psilocybin mushrooms because the defendant knew they contained psilocybin.
In Bemis v. State, the defense argued that because Indiana law only mentions psilocybin and not mushrooms, the law was unconstitutionally vague as shown in Florida v Fiske. The case went to Indiana Court of Appeals which ruled Florida v Fiske did not apply because the defendant knew the mushrooms contained psilocybin.
Psychedelic Science Review is working to bring cutting-edge science in the field of psychedelics to the public in the most accessible, thorough and accurate way possible. Join our communities on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Instagram and share our content with your network to help us bring scientifically-backed information about psychedelics to the world.
NEW! Shop the PSR Supporter Store to show your support for psychedelic science.