LSD, Music, and the Mysteries of Consciousness

Connectome-Specific Harmonic Waves: A new way of looking at the brain sheds light on the biological correlates of consciousness.


The Nature of Consciousness

What is consciousness? A question asked by philosophers, theologians, and, more recently, neuroscientists. What does the brain do, to generate the thing called “I”? In a 2017 study, Atasoy and colleagues used psychedelics, math, and fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) data to create a new method of examining neural activity, one that sheds light on the biological correlates of consciousness.1 


Twelve participants were administered LSD and a saline placebo and underwent fMRI scans 14 days apart in a counterbalanced, single-blind, within-study design. For the LSD condition, participants were administered 75µg LSD intravenously, while in the placebo condition, participants were administered saline intravenously. After the scan, participants were asked to rate the intensity of five facets of the LSD experience:

  1. Complex Imagery (i.e., eyes-closed visions of objects)
  2. Simple Hallucinations (i.e., eyes-closed visions of geometric patterns)
  3. Emotional Arousal (i.e., the intensity of emotion)
  4. Positive Mood
  5. Ego-Dissolution

Atasoy and colleagues then mathematically decomposed these fMRI scans, in a similar way to how a musical chord can be decomposed into individual notes.2 This allowed them to obtain a roadmap of neural connections in the brain. They compared the activity on these roadmaps between individuals who were sober with individuals who were tripping, along with their self-reported ratings on the five key facets of LSD experience. This roadmap is referred to by experts as the connectome. 

The Connectome

The brain is constantly active, with many neural signals traveling around the brain at any given time. The route these signals take can be mapped out by looking at neuronal connections in the brain and examining the activation patterns that take place across this map.36 Atasoy et al. focused on harmonic waves in the connectome. 

Harmonic waves are repeating signals, for example, sine waves.7 At their most basic, harmonic waves represent change over time. Oscillations in neuron activity (brainwaves) interact with each other in the brain to create harmonic patterns, similar to how individual notes on a piano when played together form a chord.

Atasoy and colleagues traced out neuronal activation patterns in the brain, with each activation pattern corresponding to a particular frequency of activation.3 At any point in time, several of these activation patterns are triggered and are contributing to the total activity in the brain. Some patterns are activated more frequently than others, and some signals oscillate across the brain faster than others. These networks of activation are building blocks of more complex patterns of brain activity.

Activation Patterns and the Ego

Atasoy et al. found that LSD makes the brain activate more neuronal patterns non-randomly. There was a reduction in lower frequency activation patterns, but an increase in higher frequency activation patterns. This was especially illuminating when the data were correlated with subjective reports of the participants. Certain neuronal activation patterns were found to correspond to certain subjective aspects of the psychedelic experience.

In low-frequency activation patterns, LSD reduced the energy of these patterns – analogous to hitting a key on the piano more gently. This reduction of energy in low-frequency activation patterns was found to correspond to the subjective experience of ego dissolution, where the less energy these patterns had, the stronger the subjective experience of ego dissolution.

Low-frequency waves travel further than high-frequency waves,8,9 losing less energy moving through a medium. An intuitive example of this is how the bass in a song is the first thing one hears when approaching a concert. Low-frequency waves would therefore be expected to be more global in nature compared to high-frequency waves, propagating further across the brain. Higher-level, global aspects of conscious experience like the ego, therefore, would be expected to be reflected in low-energy frequency states rather than more local high-frequency states, a prediction supported by the findings. 

LSD also causes more neuronal activation patterns to trigger in tripping individuals compared to sober individuals, this is analogous to using more keys to play a chord on a piano. Biologically, this means that LSD causes interaction between areas of the brain that would not interact with each other in the sober state, a finding reflected in other studies.10,11 Further research into the correlation between activation patterns and aspects of subjective experience would provide more information on how consciousness is generated in the brain. 

Banana Oil / Shutterstock

Criticality, Set, and Setting

Lastly, Atasoy et al. found that LSD shifts brain dynamics further towards criticality, a sweet spot between order and chaos. Sober mind-states tend further towards order than chaos, but still remain in the zone of criticality.12-14 Criticality enables the mechanics necessary for complex dynamics. A certain level of order is required for coherent functioning, and a certain degree of disorder is needed for flexibility and adaptability.15 Dynamic systems in the state of criticality exhibit certain traits, including optimal computational properties.16,17

Examining network correlates of creativity reveal that brain dynamics at the edge of criticality might constitute the neural basis of creativity. 18,19 Shifting towards criticality renders the brain more supple and flexible within its own intrinsic functioning but also more sensitive to incoming stimuli.13 A natural consequence of tuning the brain closer to criticality in an LSD trip is an increased sensitivity to both the external environment and internal states – referred to as ’setting’ and ’set’ respectively, in relation to psychedelics.20

Mental Health Implications

Deviations from criticality could be symptomatic or even causative of certain psychiatric disorders.21 In particular, brain dynamics in depression, addiction, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)22 have been associated with the subcritical regime, whereas the super-critical regime has been found to govern brain dynamics during epileptic seizures 17,21,23,24 and in conditions such as autism.16,23 By studying mental illnesses through this lens, more effective treatments could be devised that target the hierarchical predictive coding infrastructure of the brain. 

In conclusion, psychedelics allow for a greater understanding of the phenomenology behind the conscious experience and mental illnesses through the examination of connectome-specific harmonic waves. It also provides a potential biological correlate for other theories of consciousness, such as Tononi’s Integrated Information Theory,25 Carhart-Harris’ REBUS and the Anarchic Brain, 25,26 and Friston’s Free Energy Minimization,27 allowing for future research to potentially unify these theories. 

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
  1. Atasoy S, Roseman L, Kaelen M, et al. Connectome-harmonic decomposition of human brain activity reveals dynamical repertoire re-organization under LSD. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17661. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17546-0
  2. Stewart I. Holes and hot spots. Nature. 1999;401(6756):863-865. doi:10.1038/44730
  3. Atasoy S, Donnelly I, Pearson J. Human brain networks function in connectome-specific harmonic waves. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10340. doi:10.1038/ncomms10340
  4. Buzsaki G. Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks. Science. 2004;304(5679):1926-1929. doi:10.1126/science.1099745
  5. Deco G, Jirsa VK, McIntosh AR. Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(1):43-56. doi:10.1038/nrn2961
  6. Seung S. Connectome: How the Brain’s Wiring Makes Us Who We Are. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2012.
  7. Levy B. Laplace-Beltrami Eigenfunctions Towards an Algorithm That “Understands” Geometry. IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 2006 (SMI’06). doi:10.1109/smi.2006.21
  8. Moran LV, Hong LE. High vs low frequency neural oscillations in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(4):659-663. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbr056
  9. Muller L, Chavane F, Reynolds J, et al. Cortical travelling waves: mechanisms and computational principles. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19(5):255-268. doi:10.1038/nrn.2018.20
  10. Preller KH, Razi A, Zeidman P, Stämpfli P, et al. Effective connectivity changes in LSD-induced altered states of consciousness in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(7):2743-2748. doi:10.1073/pnas.1815129116
  11. Müller F, Borgwardt S. Acute effects of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) on resting brain function. Swiss Med Wkly. 2019;149:w20124. doi:10.4414/smw.2019.20124
  12. Haimovici A, Tagliazucchi E, Balenzuela P, et al. Brain organization into resting state networks emerges at criticality on a model of the human connectome. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110(17):178101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.178101
  13. Massobrio P, de Arcangelis L, Pasquale V, et al. Criticality as a Signature of Healthy Neural Systems: Multi-Scale Experimental and Computational Studies. Frontiers Media SA; 2015.
  14. Priesemann V, Valderrama M, Wibral M, et al. Neuronal Avalanches Differ from Wakefulness to Deep Sleep – Evidence from Intracranial Depth Recordings in Humans. PLoS Computational Biology. 2013;9(3):e1002985. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002985
  15. Plenz D. The Critical Brain. Physics. 2013;6. doi:10.1103/physics.6.47
  16. Shew WL, Plenz D. The functional benefits of criticality in the cortex. Neuroscientist. 2013;19(1):88-100. doi:10.1177/1073858412445487
  17. Priesemann V, Wibral M, Valderrama M, et al. Spike avalanches in vivo suggest a driven, slightly subcritical brain state. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:108. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00108
  18. Bilder RM, Knudsen KS. Creative cognition and systems biology on the edge of chaos. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1104. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01104
  19. Beaty RE, Benedek M, Kaufman SB, et al. Default and Executive Network Coupling Supports Creative Idea Production. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1). doi:10.1038/srep10964
  20. Hartogsohn I. Set and setting, psychedelics and the placebo response: An extra-pharmacological perspective on psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol. 2016;30(12):1259-1267. doi:10.1177/0269881116677852
  21. Meisel C, Storch A, Hallmeyer-Elgner S, et al. Failure of adaptive self-organized criticality during epileptic seizure attacks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(1):e1002312. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002312
  22. Carhart-Harris RL, Leech R, Hellyer PJ, et al. The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014;8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00020
  23. Pearlmutter BA, Houghton CJ. A new hypothesis for sleep: tuning for criticality. Neural Comput. 2009;21(6):1622-1641. doi:10.1162/neco.2009.05-08-787
  24. Hesse J, Gross T. Self-organized criticality as a fundamental property of neural systems. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2014;8. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00166
  25. Tononi G, Boly M, Massimini M, et al. Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2016;17(7):450-461. doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.44
  26. Carhart-Harris RL, Friston KJ. REBUS and the Anarchic Brain: Toward a Unified Model of the Brain Action of Psychedelics. Pharmacological Reviews. 2019;71(3):316-344. doi:10.1124/pr.118.017160
  27. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci 2010;11(2):127-138. doi:10.1038/nrn2787